KARUTURI SATYANARAYNA v. PENUMAKA SPARJAN
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 17 Jul 2026
- Bench
- PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR, ADDL DISTRICT
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Recording the said submission, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Civil Revision Petition…
Judgment
Cause title
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3207/2017 Between:
1. KARUTURI SATYANARAYNA,, S/O.LATE KRISHNA RAO, AGE 57 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O.NADIPALLI (V), PERAVALI (M), WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
2. KARUTURI SUBBA RAO,, S/O.LATE KRISHNA RAO, AGE 55 YEARS, OCC.GENERAL MANAGER IN ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO., MIG.NO.12-43-5, HOUSING BOARD COLONY, TANUKU, W.G.DISTRICT.
3. KARUTURI NARAYANA RAO,, S/O.LATE KRISHNA RAO, AGE 51 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O.D.NO.1-94, R/O.NADIPALLI (V), PERAVALI (M), W.G.DISTRICT. AND ...PETITIONER(S)
1. PENUMAKA SPARJAN, S/O.LATE DAVID RAJU, AGE 76 YEARS, OCC.BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.1-7/3, 15TH WARD, NIDADAVOLE, MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. NIDADAVOLE
2. MADDIPOTI SUBBARAO, S/O.RAMANNA, AGE 78 YEARS, OCC.CULTIVATION, D.NO.3-226, PERAVARAM, ATHREYAPURAM (M), EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
3. KARUTURI NAGAMANI, W/O.LATE KRISHNA RAO, AGE 67 YEARS, OCC.HOUSE WIFE, R/O.D.NO.4-25, KANURU, PERAVALI (M), W.G.DISTRICT. NOT NECESSARY PARTY IN THIS CRP) (R-3 IS ...RESPONDENT(S)
: Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to against the order dated 14-06-2017 2 PKC, J CRP No.3207 of 2017 passed in I.A.No.253/2017 in O.S.No.38/2015, on the file of IV Addl. District Judge, Tanuku, W.G.District, IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 4225 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in OS NO.38 of 2015 on the file of IV Addl. District Judge, Tanuku, pending disposal of the above CRP, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. ELEVATED AS JUDGE Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. POLISETTY RADHA KRISHNA The Court made the following: 3 PKC, J CRP No.3207 of 2017 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CH.PURUSHOTHAM KUMAR
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3207 of 2017
ORDER:
Smt M.L.Neelima, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners appeared through virtual mode and submitted that she has no instructions from the petitioners.
Recording the said submission, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Civil Revision Petition shall stand closed. ___________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI,J Date:17.07.2026 4 PKC, J CRP No.3207 of 2017 61 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CH.PURUSHOTHAM KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3207 of 2017 Date:17.07.2026
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 17 Jul 2026. The bench was PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR, ADDL DISTRICT.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.