POOJARI v. THE STATE OF AP
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 16, 21, 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated: 25.03.2025 SNI 4 24 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.810 OF…
Judgment
Cause title
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 810/2025 Between:
1. POOJARI OF GROUP COMPANIES/POOJARI HEALTH AWARENESS, POOJARI GROUP OF COMPANIES/POOJARI HEALTH AWARENESS, PLOT.NO. 1-88/2, 5TH FLOOR, GEM SECURE BUILDING, ABOVE HDFC BANK, MADHAPUR, ITS BRANCH OF OFFICE AT HYDERABAD-500081, D.NO.33-22-1, 2ND FLOOR, VISALANDHRA ROAD, CHUTTUGUNTA, VIJAYAWADA TOWN PART VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA CENTRAL MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, KAJA RAMESH BABU HAVING ...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, BC WELFARE DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH BACKWARD CLASSES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED APBCCFCL, REP.BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, 4TH FLOOR, VISHAL RESIDENCY, TADIGADAPA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AND SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. FINANCE ...RESPONDENT(S)
: 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents herein in not paying an amount of Rs. 10,62,00,000/- pursuant to the Invoice No.23982/POJ/23-24 dated 29-09-2023 for the work executed by the petitioner i.e., telecast awareness of the APBC Welfare Awareness Campaign on NCBC, P.M.YASASVI Post Metric Scholarships, NDCFDC and P.M. YASASVI Pre Metric Scholarships through CCTV in Government Hospitals for a period of 30 days (from 14-08-2023 to 12-09-2023) as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents herein forthwith to release and pay an amount of Rs. 10,62,00,000/- along with interest @24percent p.a., to the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein forthwith to release and pay an amount of Rs. 10,62,00,000/- pursuant to the Invoice No.23982/POJ/23-24 dated 29-09- 2023 for the work executed by the petitioner i.e., telecast awareness of the APBC Welfare Awareness Campaign on NCBC, P.M.YASASVI Post Metric Scholarships, NDCFDC and P.M. YASASVI Pre Metric Scholarships through CCTV in Government Hospitals for a period of 30 days (from 14-08-2023 to 12-09-2023)., pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P L NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following: ::
ORDER::
In pursuance of letter dated 24.03.2025 addressed to the Registrar (Judicial), learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. 3
Permission is accorded.
Operative part
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated: 25.03.2025 SNI 4 24 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.810 OF 2025 Dated: 25.03.2025 SNI
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 16, 21, 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 25 Mar 2025. The bench was SUBBA REDDY SATTI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.