YANAMADDI NAGAMALLESWARA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 04 May 2026
- Bench
- SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Outcome
Disposed of
the Criminal Petitions are hereby disposed of as
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 437, 438, 439, 482
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 149
Judgment
Cause title
9. PEDDU SRIKANTH,, C/O PEDDU RAMA RAO,( A-32) AGED ABOUT 10-15A-D4, SANTHINAGAR, GUDIVADA, 36 YEARS, HINDU, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
10. RAVURI SESHI KUMAR,, S/O RASURI PRAKASH RAO, (A-33) AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, HINDU, R/O 18/86, PEDAYERUKAPADU, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
11. KATIKALA KALYAN,, S/O KATIKALA KRISHNA ,(A- 34) AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, HINDU, R/O 18/81, PEDAYERUKAPADU, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
12. RAYALASUBBARAO,, S/O CHENNARAO,( A- 9) AGED ABOUT 50 TELLADEVARAPALLI, YEARS, VISSANNAPETAMANDAL,KRISHNA DISTRICT. HINDU, 2-68/3, R/O
13. MADALA HAIL CHARAN,, . S/O UNKNOWN, A-11) AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, HINDU, R/O 1-34, MUSTIKUNTLA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER
/ACCUSED(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep.by itsPublic Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh through S.H.O, Tiruvuru P.S, NTR District ...RESPONDENT
/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to grant Anticipatory Bail to the Petitioners for offences under section 143, 147, 353, 333, 326 r/w 149 IPC in F.I.R No. 2/2024 at Tiruvuru P.S, NTR District to the petitioners and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. G V L MURTHY
2. REGULAGADDA VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 3
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1944/2024 Between:
1. YANAMADDI NAGAMALLESWARA RAO,, S/O. PURNAYYA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, D.NO. 1-18A, CHINTALANAVARA VILLAGE, GAMPALAGUDEM MANDAL, MEDURU VILLAGE, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
2. BOLLINENI NAGENDRA KUMAR @ NAGGU, , S/O. KISHORE KUMAR AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. 3-19A, MAIN ROAD, NEAR RICEMILL, LAKSHMIPURAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. PONNEBOENA NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O. 3-13, SANJEEVAPURAM BAZAR, KONDURU KHAMBAMPADU, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. YANDRATHI RANJITH KUMAR,, S/O. KANAKA DURGA PRASAD AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O. 5-123, PATA TIRUVURU, TIRUVURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER
/ACCUSED(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Through the Station House Officer, Tiruvuru P.S, Rep. By its public prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravathi. ...RESPONDENT
/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant Anticipatory Bail to the Petitioners /Accused No. 1,10,12,14 for offences under section 143, 147, 353, 333, 326 /w 149 IPC in F.I.R No. 2/2024 at Tiruvuru P.S, NTR District to the petitioners Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. MEDAPATI SANTOSH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL PETITION NOS: 111 & 1944 of 2024
COMMON ORDER:
Operative part
Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits, on written instructions, that the police have already concluded the investigation and filed a charge sheet in connection with Crime No. 02 of 2024 of Tiruvuru Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 353, 333, and 326 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The learned Trial Court has assigned the case as P.R.C. No. 21 of 2025, dated 14.12.2025. The instant Criminal Petitions have been filed for Anticipatory Bail by the accused persons. As Charge sheet have been submitted, the instant Criminal Petitions for Anticipatory Bails become infructuous. Accordingly, the Criminal Petitions are hereby disposed of as infructuous. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated:04.05.2026. SSA
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the Criminal Petitions are hereby disposed of as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 437, 438, 439, 482; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 149.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 04 May 2026. The bench was SUBHENDU SAMANTA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.