Andhra Pradesh State Agro Industries Development Corp. Ltd v. Kartham Venugopala Reddy & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. Date:21.01.2025 MS _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO.1341…
Judgment
Cause title
TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 1341/2004 Between: Andhra Pradesh State Agro Industries Development Corp. Ltd ...APPELLANT
AND Kartham Venugopala Reddy and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. P SHASHI VARDHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. T P ACHARYA The Court made the following
JUDGMENT:
This Second Appeal was filed by the appellant/plaintiff under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 24.02.2004 passed in A.S.No.106 of 2002 on the file of learned VIII Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Guntur, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 19.04.2002 passed in O.S.No.784 of 1999 on the file of learned III Additional Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Guntur.
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, no representation on behalf of either side. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M.
In the afternoon session also, there was no representation on behalf of either side despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It seems that the appellant is not evincing any interest to prosecute with the appeal.
Operative part
Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. Date:21.01.2025 MS _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO.1341 OF 2004 Date:21.01.2025 MS
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 100.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 21 Jan 2025. The bench was T MALLIKARJUNA RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.