Gudipudi Sri Rama Laxmamma (died) & Ors. v. DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Recording the above submission, the Second Appeal is dismissed as
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Recording the above submission, the Second Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. To //TRUE COPY// Sd/- V.…
Judgment
Gudipudi Sri Rama Laxmamma (died),
Erraju Veerabrahmam, S/o. Narasimhachari, Hindu, Occ: Cultivation R/o. Sivalayam Street, Yadava Street, Vijayawada -1. ...Respondents/ Respondents/Plaintiffs Counsel for the Appellants : Sri Chetiuru Sreenivas Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sri P. Vijaya Kiran The Court made the following: APHC010006602008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 37Q/2nnfi Between: Kola Mohan Rao (hindu) and Others AND ...APPELLANT{S) Gudipudi Sri Rama Laxmamma Died and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1.CHETLURU SREENIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.P VIJAYAKIRAN ...RESPONDENT THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT: The Second Appeal is preferred by the appellants against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2008, passed in A.S.No.130 of 2005 . on the file of the V Additional Distri^ Judge (Fast Track Court), Guntur, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2005, passed in O.S.No.377 of 1994, the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Guntur. I
2. Sri D.Srihari, learned counsel representing Sri Chetiuru Sreenivas learned counsel for the appellants is present. None appeared for the respondents.
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri D.Srihari, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the appellants submits that the matter has become infructuous as the cause of action does not survive and hence, he requests this Court to close this appeal.
Operative part
Recording the above submission, the Second Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. To //TRUE COPY// Sd/- V. DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
1. The V Additional District Judge (FTC), Guntur, Guntur District, (with records if any)
2. The Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Guntur, Guntur District.
3. One CC to Sri Chetiuru Sreenivas, Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to Sri P. Vijaya Kiran, Advocate [OPUC]
The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. (to dispatch the trial court records)
Three CD Copies TK Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:31/01/2025 TK JUDGMENT SA.No.370 of 2008 DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL AS INFRUCTUOUS
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the above submission, the Second Appeal is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 100.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 31 Jan 2025. The bench was T MALLIKARJUNA RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.