Pentapati Rukmini & Ors. v. M/s Nischala Chit Fund P Ltd
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. Date:11.02.2025 MS _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO.358…
Judgment
Cause title
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 358/2008 Between: Pentapati Rukmini and Others ...APPELLANT(S)
AND M/s Nischala Chit Fund P Ltd ...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent:
1. B K RAMESH BABU The Court made the following
JUDGMENT:
This Second Appeal was filed by the appellants/defendants under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 26.12.2007 passed in A.S.No.130 of 2006 on the file of IX Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC), Guntur at Tenali, reversing the judgment and decree, dated 26.04.2006 passed in O.S.No.45 of 2003 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Tenali.
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, no representation on behalf of either side. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M.
In the post lunch session also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on payment of costs of Rs.500/- by the appellants, none appeared on their behalf. It seems that the appellants are not evincing any interest to prosecute with the appeal.
Operative part
Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. Date:11.02.2025 MS _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO.358 OF 2008 Date:11.02.2025 MS
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 100.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 11 Feb 2025. The bench was T MALLIKARJUNA RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.