Sastry v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, this criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn, leaving it open
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn, leaving it open for the petitioner to challenge the charge sheet. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall ^>^^1 closed. \ To, //TRUE COPY// Sd/- K SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION…
Judgment
B.R Ambedkar Konaseema District. Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. Andhra Pradesh, Through P.S., Draksharama, Dr.
Anasuri Satyanarayana, S/o. Appa Rao, Aged about 64 years, Occ Agriculture, Caste BC (Settibalija) R/o. D.No. 1-131-5, Yenamadalapeta, Near Oogulamma Temple, Kapuvaram (V), Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Dr B R Ambedkar Konaseema District. ...RESPONDENT ...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to quash the entire proceedings in Crime No.277 of 2024 dt.04.12.2024, Registered by the B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema District. Police, Draksharama, Dr. Inspector of This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P LALITHA KAMESH, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: APHC010000662025 ■m IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 36/2025 Between: K V L N Sastry ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1.P LALITHA KAMESH Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order : The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the present criminal petition.
Operative part
Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn, leaving it open for the petitioner to challenge the charge sheet. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall ^>^^1 closed. \ To, //TRUE COPY// Sd/- K SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
1. The Station House Officer, Draksharama Police Station, Dr.B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema District.
3. One CC to SRI. P LALITHA KAMESH Advocate [OPUC] Two CCS to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravati [OUT]
Three CD Copies Pmg HIGH COURT DATED:06/05/2025 m ORDER CRLP.No.36 of 2025 S 21 AUG 2025 . Currant Section DISMISSING THE CRLP AS WITHDRAWN
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn, leaving it open
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 06 May 2025. The bench was HARINATH N.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.