✦ Supreme Court of India · 29 Jan 2025

S. Vishnu Ganga & Ors. v. M/s Oriental Insurance Company Limited

SUDHANSHU DHULIA, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH15 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The appeals stand disposed of in the aforesaid manner

Judgment

1 S.C.R. 1163 : 2025 INSC 123 S. Vishnu Ganga & Ors. v. M/s Oriental Insurance Company Limited Rep. by Its Divisional Manager & Ors. (Civil Appeals No(s). 1162-1163 of 2025) 29 January 2025 [Sudhanshu Dhulia and Ahsanuddin Amanullah,* JJ.] Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court reducing the amount of compensation granted under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Headnotes† Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Compensation – Enhancement – Parents of the appellants met with an accident resulting in their death while travelling in a vehicle after the bus belonging to respondent no.3 dashed into the said vehicle – Appellants claimed identical compensation for the parents as both were partners in a Mill – Tribunal granted compensation of Rs.58,24,000/- for the father and Rs.93,61,000/- for the mother with interest – High Court reduced the amount of compensation to Rs.26,68,600/- for the father and Rs.19,22,680/- for the mother – Interference with: Held: Award rendered by the tribunal is well-considered – Merely because the appellants stepped into the shoes of the deceased, by such factum itself, the appellants would not be capable of running the Mill – Lack of experience and maturity, real/expected downfall in the profitability of the firm relevant while considering a claim pertaining to loss of future income/earnings – Notional income fixed by the tribunal of Rs.60,000/- each per month, is much more reasonable – Income Tax Returns reliable evidence to assess the income of a deceased – Between the formula applied by the tribunal vis-a-vis the approach adopted by the High Court, the view of the tribunal rendered in the form of the award satisfies the judicial conscience – High Court’s reasoning militates against settled law – Impugned judgment set aside. [Paras 11, 14] * Author 1164 [2025] 1 S.C.R. Case Law Cited

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The appeals stand disposed of in the aforesaid manner

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Constitution of India.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Supreme Court of India, on 29 Jan 2025. The bench was SUDHANSHU DHULIA, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Supreme Court of India or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments