SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION POWER COMPANY v. M/S HINDUJA NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION LIMITED
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In the result, the present appeal is dismissed with costs,
Provisions considered
Judgment
In any case, the impugned judgment of APTEL cannot be said to be of such a nature, which can be said to be prejudicial to the interests of any of the parties. What has been done by the APTEL is only to direct the State Commission to dispose of O.P. No.21 of 2015 filed for determination of capital cost and O.P. No.19 of 2016 filed for approval of Amended and Restated PPA (Continuation Agreement) on merits. On remand, the State Commission would be bound to take into consideration all the relevant factors and the contentions to be raised by both the parties before deciding the said O.Ps. [Para 109][239-F-G] Hulas Rai Baij Nath v. Firm K.B. Bass and Co. [1967] 3 SCR 886 – distinguished.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In the result, the present appeal is dismissed with costs,
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Electricity Act, 2003 — ss. 61, 86(1)(b); Constitution of India — art. 12; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, 1998 — s. 21; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Docks and Harbours Act, 1966.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.