KURVAN ANSARI ALIAS KURVAN ALI & Anr. v. SHYAM KISHORE MURMU & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, this Civil Appeal is allowed partly with directions
Provisions considered
Judgment
Judgment
366 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2021] 7 S.C.R. 366 [2021] 7 S.C.R. A KURVAN ANSARI ALIAS KURVAN ALI & ANR. v. SHYAM KISHORE MURMU & ANR. (Civil Appeal No. 6902 of 2021) NOVEMBER 16, 2021 [R. SUBHASH REDDY AND HRISHIKESH ROY, JJ.] Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: s.163-A – Notional income – Determination of – Claim made under s.163-A – Deceased child - not an earning member – Tribunal considered notional income as per Schedule II for fixing compensation – Claimant seeking enhancement of compensation – Held: It was observed in Puttamma & Ors. that the Central Government was bestowed with the duties to amend Schedule-II in view of s.163-A(3), but it failed to do so – In view of the same, specific directions were issued in the said case to the Central Government to make appropriate amendments to Schedule-II keeping in mind the current cost of living – In spite of repeated directions, Schedule-II was not amended – Therefore, fixing notional income at Rs.15,000/- p.a. for non earning member was not just and reasonable – In view of the judgments in Puttamma, R.K.
Malik and Kishan Gopal, it is a fit case to increase the notional income by taking into account the inflation, devaluation of the rupee and cost of living – Notional income of deceased fixed at Rs.25,000/ - p.a. and compensation awarded accordingly. Partly allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: The Tribunal awarded compensation by taking notional income of the deceased at Rs.15,000/- per annum. It was observed in Puttamma that the Central Government was bestowed with the duties to amend Schedule-II in view of Section 163-A(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988, but it failed to do so. In view of the same, specific directions were issued to the Central Government to make appropriate amendments to Schedule-II keeping in mind the present cost of living.
In the said judgment, till such amendments are made, directions were issued for award of compensation by fixing a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation for the non-earning children up to the age of five years old and a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- for the non earning persons 366 B C D E F G H KURVAN ANSARI ALIAS KURVAN ALI & ANR. v. SHYAM KISHORE MURMU & ANR. 367 of more than five years old. In the case of R.K. Malik also, this Court had observed that the notional income fixed under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 as Rs.15,000/- per annum should be enhanced and increased as the same continued to exist without any amendment since 14.11.1994. In the case of Kishan Gopal, where the deceased was a ten years old child, this Court had fixed his notional income at Rs.30,000/- per annum.
In this case, the accident occurred on 06.09.2004. In view of the judgments in Puttamma, R.K. Malik and Kishan Gopal, it is a fit case to increase the notional income by taking into account the inflation, devaluation of the rupee and cost of living. The notional income of the deceased is taken at Rs.25,000/- per annum. [Paras 12-16][370-D-H; 371-B-C]
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Civil Appeal is allowed partly with directions
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.