STATE OF GUJARAT v. NAVINBHAI CHANDRAKANT JOSHI
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ss. 7, 8, 13(1)(d), 13(2)
Judgment
From the Judgment and Order dated 16.04.2015 of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Appeal Nos. 477 and 478 of 2000. Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Ms. Jesal Wahi, Ms. Puja Singh, Ms. Vishakha Advs. for the Appellant. Parthiv Goswami, Pradhuman Gohil, Ms. Taruna Singh Gohil, Vikash Singh, Himanshu Chaubey, Ms. Tanvi Bhatnagar Advs. for the Respondent/Applicant. 1141 A B C D E F G H 1142 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 14 S.C.R. A The following Order of the Court was passed : O R D E R This is a petition filed by the accused no. 2/respondent no. 1 to modify the judgment dated 17.7.2018 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 895-896/ 2018. In paragraph (3) of the judgment, the accused no. 2/respondent no. 1 has been stated to be the Government servant, which is not factually correct. Though, the accused no. 2/respondent no. 1 is not a Government servant, bribe amount in currency notes of Rs.500/- were recovered from him only; there were signs of anthracene powder noticed from the shirt pocket of the accused no. 2/respondent no. 1. Considering the fact that currency notes were recovered form the accused no. 2/respondent no. 1, in our view, the ingredients of Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are established. The conviction of the accused no. 2/respondent no. 1 under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is modified as the conviction under Section 8 of the said Act, and the sentence of one year imposed is reduced to six months. The judgment shall be modified accordingly. Divya Pandey Earlier judgment modified. B C D E F G H
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.