NANDLAL WASUDEO BADWAIK v. LATA NANDLAL BADWAIK & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
test. The respondents did not oppose the prayer of DNA test when such a prayer was being considered. It was only after the reports of the DNA test had been received, which was adverse to the respondents, that they challenged it on the ground that such a test ought not to F have been directed. This Court, at this stage, cannot go into the validity of the orders passed by a coordinate Bench. It has attained finality. [para 10] [129-C-E] Goutam Kundu v. State of W.B., 1993 (3) SCR 917 = G
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Supreme Court of India or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Appeal No. 24 of 2014).
← Search more judgments