✦ Supreme Court of India

GORKHA SECURITY SERVICES v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & Ors.

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

The appeal is allowed to this extent

Provisions considered

Judgment

Judgment

[2014] 13 S.C.R. 617 GORKHA SECURITY SERVICES V. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. (Civil Appeal Nos. 7167-7168 of 2014) AUGUST 04, 2014 A B [J. CHELAMESWAR AND A. K. SIKRI, JJ.] Administrative Law - Imposition of penalty - Blacklisting - Form and content of show cause notice C required to be served, before deciding as to whether the noticee is to be blacklisted or not - Held: It is incumbent to state in the show cause notice that the competent authority intends to impose a penalty of blacklisting, so as to provide adequate and meaningful opportunity to the noticee to show 0 cause against the same - However, even if it is not mentioned specifically but from the reading of the show cause notice, it can be clearly inferred that such an action was proposed, that would fulfill this requirement.

Administrative Law- Violation of contract- Imposition E of penalty - Blacklisting of appellant-contractor - Validity Held: Blacklisting of appellant without giving it notice thereto, was contrary to principles of natural justice as it was not specifically proposed and, therefore, there was no s,how cause notice given to this effect before taking action of F blacklisting against the appellant - blacklisting the appellant accordingly set aside. Impugned action of Partly allowing the appeals, the Court HELD:1. Blacklisting has to be preceded by a show G cause notice. The necessity of compliance wUh the principles of natural justice by giving the opportunity to the person against whom action of blacklisting is sought to be taken has a valid and solid rationale behind it.

617 H 618 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 13 S.C.R. A Unless a statutory provision either specifically or by necessary implication excludes the application of any rules of natural justice, in exercise of power pre-judicially affecting another must be in conformity with the rules of natural justice. [Paras 17, 29][627-G-H; 637-A-B] B c

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The appeal is allowed to this extent

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Minimum Wages Act; Constitution of India — arts. 226, 298.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Supreme Court of India or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Appeal No. 7167-7168 of 2014). ← Search more judgments