Gokul Educational Trust v. Commissioner and Secretary to Government High Education Department v. GOPALA GOWDA, J & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
The civil appeals are allowed
Provisions considered
- Provisions of AICTE Act
- All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 ss. 25, 26
- UGC Act, 1956
- O(k) of AICTE Act s. 1
- Council for Technical Education Act, 1987
- O(k) of the AICTE Act s. 1
- Bharathidasan University Act, 1981
- Bharathidasan University Act
- University Grants Commission Act
- Amendment Act, 1972
- Constitution of India arts. 254, 254(2)
- Parliament and the Bharathidasan University Act, 1981
- AICTE H Act s. 2(g)
- Technology Act, 1961
Judgment
6 S.C.R. 1054 A s ASSOCIATION OF MANAGEMENT OF PRIVATE COLLEGES v. ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 1145 of 2004) APRIL 25, 2013 [DR. B.S. CHAUHAN AND V. GOPALA GOWDA, JJ.] C All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - ss.2(h), 10, 11, 12 and 13- Technical education imparted by Universities and their affiliated colleges - Status of the affiliated colleges - Purview of definition of "technical institution" - Role of A/GTE - Held: The role of the inspection D conferred upon the A/GTE vis-a-vis Universities is limited to the purpose of ensuring proper maintenance of norms and standards in the technical education system so as to conform to the standard laid down by it with no further or direct control over such Universities or scope for any direct action except E bringing it to the notice of UGC - Role of A/GTE vis-a-vis Universities is only advisory, recommendatory and one of providing guidance and has no authority empowering it to issue or enforce any sanctions by itself - Colleges affiliated to University/Universities are part of them and the exclusion F of University in the definition of technical institution as defined in s.2(h) of the A/GTE Act must be extended to the affiliated colleges also - Provisions of AICTE Act are to be implemented through UGC as Universities and its affiliated colleges are all governed by provisions of the said Act u/s.12A of the UGC Act read with Rules Regulations framed by the G UGC in exercise of its power ulss.25 and 26 of the said Act - Autonomy of the University is recognized and the object and intendment of the Parliament in excluding the Universities from the definition of technical institution as defined uls.2(h) H 1054 --t ASSON. OF MAGMT. OF PVT. COLLEGES v.
ALL INDIA 1055 COUNCIL FOR TECH. EDU. of the A/GTE Act makes this explicitly clear- The powers and A functions conferred for controlling and regulating the universities and its affiliated colleges has been explicitly conferred upon the UGC - University Grants Commission Act, 1956- s.12A rlw ss.25 and 26. All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - B s.2(g) - Technical education - Course in Computer Applications at post graduation level (MCA) - Contention raised on behalf of the A/GTE that technical education includes MCA - Held: Stands to its reasoning and logic in C view of the nature of MCA course imparted to the students at post graduation level by the institutions, constituent colleges and affiliated colleges to the Universities - Meanings of the words 'technology' and 'engineering' as per the dictionaries clearly show that MCA also comes within the definition of technology - The same is technical education and therefore, D comes within the definition of technical education but for its proper conduct of courses and regulation, the role of A/GTE must be advisory and for the same, a note shall be given to the UGC for its implementation by it but not the A/GTE All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - s.2(g) - Course in Management at post-graduate level (MBA) If 'technical education' uls.2(g) of the A/GTE Act - Non - production of any material by the A/GTE to show that MBA course is technical education - Held: MBA course is not a technical course within definition of the A/GTE Act - Reasons assigned for MCA course being 'technical education' does not hold for MBA course - Approval from the A/GTE not required for obtaining permission and running MBA course by the appellant colleges.
A/I India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987- s.24 - A/GTE Regulations - Amended regulation introduced by A/GTE in exercise of its power u/s. 10(k) of the A/GTE Act - However, amended Regulation not placed before the Parliament as mandatorily required as per s.24 of the A/GTE E F G H 1056 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2013] 6 S.C.R. A Act - Effect - Held: If the Statute prescribes a particular procedure to do an act in a particular way, that act must be done in that manner, otherwise it is not at all done - Non placing of the amended Regulations on the floor of the Houses of the Parliament as required u/s.24 of the A/GTE Act B vitiated the amended Regulations in law - Administrative Law. Writ petition was filed by the appellant association of colleges seeking relief to prohibit the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) from exercising its jurisdiction over its' member colleges (affiliated to C Bharathidasan University or Manonmaniam Sundaranar University) with reference to the Master of Business Administration (MBA) and Master of Computer Applications (MCA) courses conducted by them.
The writ petition was dismissed by the single Judge of the High D Court holding that the All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 (AICTE Act) and the AICTE Regulations were enforceable against the member colleges of the appellant Association. Writ appeal filed thereagainst was also dismissed. E Vide the impugned judgment, the High Court interpreted the provisions of the AICTE Act and held that even though the University concerned was not required to take permission from the AICTE, its affiliated colleges F were required to do so; and further that the appellant colleges should get its course of Master of Computer Applications (MCA) ratified by AICTE as per the prescribed format. In the instant appeals, therefore, the following G questions of law arose for consideration:- (1) Whether the colleges affiliated to the University concerned comes within the purview of exclusion of the definition of "Technical Institution" as defined under Section 2(h) of H ASSON. OF MAGMT OF PVT. COLLEGES v.
ALL INDIA 1057 COUNCIL FOR TECH. EDU. the AICTE Act, 1987; and whether the AICTE A has got the control and supervision upon the affiliated colleges of the respective universities of the member colleges of the appellant in C.A.No.1145/2004 and the appellants in connected appeals? B (2) Whether the MCA course be construed as technical education in terms of definition under section 2(g) of the AICTE Act? (3) Whether the Regulation B(c) and B(iv) of the C AICTE Regulations by way of amendment in the year 2000 inserting the words 'MBA and MCA' before Architecture and Hotel Management courses is applicable to the concerned colleges of the appellants; and D whether non placement of the amended Regulations before Houses of the Parliament as required under Section 24 of the AICTE Act is vitiated in law? Allowing the appeals, the Court E HELD: 1.
The AICTE Act does not contain any evidence of an intention to belittle and destroy the authority or autonomy of other statutory bodies which they are assigned to perform. Further, the AICTE Act does F not intend to be an authority either superior or to supervise or control the universities and thereby superimpose itself upon the said universities merely for the reason that it is laying down certain teaching standards in technical education or programmes G formulated in any of the department or units. While enacting the AICTE Act, the Parliament was fully alive to the existence of the provisions of UGC Act, 1956. Special care has consciously and deliberately been taken to make specific mention of university, wherever and H 1058 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2013] 6 S.C.R. A whenever the AICTE alone was expected to interact with university and its departments as well as constituent institutions and units. The role of the inspection conferred upon the AICTE vis-a-vis universities is limited to the purpose of ensuring proper maintenance of norms B and standards in the technical education system so as to conform to the standard laid down by it with no further or direct control over such universities or scope for any direct action except bringing it to the notice of UGC. The role of AICTE vis-a-vis universities is only advisory, c recommendatory and one of providing guidance and has no authority empowering it to issue or enforce any sanctions by itself. It can only advise the UGC for formulating the standard of education and other aspects to the UGC. AICTE norms can be applied to the affiliated colleges through UGC. [Para 38] [1108-E-H; 1109-A-C, F; 1110-C] 0 E
1.
It is also relevant to refer to the exclusion of university from the definition of 'technical institution' as defined under section 2(h) of the AICTE Act. The Institution means an institution not being university, the applicability of bringing the university as defined under clause 2 (f) of UGC Act includes the institution deemed to be a university under Section 3 of the said Act and therefore the affiliated colleges are excluded from the F purview of technical institution definition of the AICTE Act. Section 12A of the UGC Act clearly speaks of regulation of fees and provisions of donation in certain cases which refers to the phrase affiliation together with its grammatical variation included in relation to a college, G recognition of such college by, association of such college with, and admission of such college to the privileges of universities. A careful reading of sub sections (2)(c), (3), (4) and (5) of Section 12A of the UGC Act makes it abundantly clear about colleges which are H required to be affiliated to run the courses for which ASSON. OF MAGMT. OF PVT. COLLEGES v.
ALL INDIA 1059 COUNCIL FOR TECH. EDU. sanction/approval will be accorded by the university or A under the control and supervision of such universities. Therefore, affiliated colleges to the university/universities are part of them and the exclusion of university in the definition of technical institution as defined in Section 2(h) of the AICTE Act must be extended to the affiliated B colleges to the university also, otherwise, the object and purpose of the UGC Act enacted by the Parliament will be defeated. The enactment of UGC Act is also traceable to Entry 66 of List I. The role of the AICTE Act is only advisory in nature and is confined to submitting report c or giving suggestions to the UGC for the purpose of implementing its suggestions to maintain good standards in technical education in terms of definition under Section 2(h) of the AICTE Act and to see that there shall be uniform education standard throughout the country to be maintained which is the laudable object of the AICTE Act for which it is enacted by the Parliament.
The provisions of the AICTE Act shall be implemented through the UGC as the universities and its affiliated colleges are all governed by the provisions of the said Act under Section 12A of the UGC Act read with Rules Regulations that will be framed by the UGC in exercise of its power under Sections 25 and 26 of the said Act. The autonomy of the university is recognized and the object and intendment of the Parliament in excluding the universities from the definition of technical institution as defined under Section 2(h) of the AICTE Act makes this explicitly clear, after scanning the definition of education institution with reference to the exclusion of universities and Sections 10, 11, 12 and 13 of the AICTE Act. The powers and functions conferred for controlling and regulating the G universities and its affiliated colleges has been explicitly conferred upon the UGC. Hence, it has been given the power to regulate such universities and regulations in relation to granting sanctions/approvals and also maintaining educational standards and over-seeing the D E F H 1060 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2013] 6 S.C.R. A prescription of the fee structure including the admission of students in various courses and programmes that will be conducted by the university and its institutions, constituent colleges, units and the affiliated colleges. [Paras 39, 40] (1110-E-H; 1111-A-G; 1116-G-H; 1117-A-D] B Bharathidasan University & Anr. v.
A/GTE & Ors. (2001) 8 SCC 676: 2001 (3) Suppl. SCR 253 - held applicable. Unni Krishnan J.P. & Ors. v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. 1993 (1) SCC 645: 1993 (1) SCR 594- held overruled. C TMA Pai Foundation v. State of Kamataka (2002) 8 SCC 481: 2002 (3) Suppl. SCR 587 - followed. Parashavananth Charitable Trust & Ors. v. A/GTE 2013 (3) sec 385 - relied on. D
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The civil appeals are allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Provisions of AICTE Act; All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 — ss. 25, 26; UGC Act, 1956; O(k) of AICTE Act — s. 1; Council for Technical Education Act, 1987; O(k) of the AICTE Act — s. 1.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.