ASST. ENGINEER, RAJASTHAN DEV. CORP & Anr. v. GITAM SINGH
Case at a glance
Outcome
Partly allowed
The appeal is partly allowed to the above extent with
Provisions considered
- Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 s. 11A
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 16
Judgment
Assam Oil Company Limited, New Delhi v. Its Workmen AIR 1960 SC 1264: 1960 SCR 457; Mis. Hindustan Steels Ltd., Rourke/av. A.K. Roy and Ors. (1969) 3 SCC 513: 1970 (3) SCR 343; Mis. Ruby General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Shri P.P. Chopra (1969) 3 SCC 653; The Management of F Panitole Tea Estate v. The Workmen (1971) 1 SCC 742: 1971 (3) SCR 774; Mis. Tulsidas Paul v. The Second Labour Court, WB. and Ors.(1972) 4 SCC 205; Manager, Reserve Bank of India, Bangalore v. S. Mani and Ors. (2005) 5 SCC 100: 2005 (2) SCR 797; Nagar Mahapalika (Now Municipal Corpn.) v. State of U.P. and Ors. (2006) 5 SCC 127: 2006 (1) G Suppl. SCR 681; Municipal Council, Sujanpur v. Surinder Kumar (2006) 5 SCC 173: 2006 (1) Suppl. SCR 914; Haryana State Electronics Development Corporation Ltd. v. Mamni (2006) 9 SCC 434: 2006 (1) Suppl. SCR 638; Regional Manager, SB/ v. Mahatma Mishra (2006) 13 SCC H ASST. ENGINEER, RAJASTHAN DEV. CORP. v. GITAM SINGH 681 727: 2006 (8) Suppl. SCR 216; Haryana Urban A Development Authority v. Om Pal (2007) 5 SCC 742:s 2007 (4) SCR 1091 ; Uttaranchal Forest Development Corporation v. M.C.Joshi (2007) 9 SCC 353: 2007 (3) SCR 114; Madhya Pradesh Administration v. Tribhuban (2007) 9 SCC 748: 2001' (4) SCR 918; Mahboob Deepak v. Nagar Panchayat, B Gajraula and Anr. (2008) 1 SCC 575: 2007 (13) SCR 672; Telecom District Manager and Ors. v. Keshab Deb (2008) 8 SCC 402: 2008 (7) SCR 835; Talwara Co-operative Credit and Service Society Limited v. Sushi/ Kumar (2008) 9 SCC 486: 2008 (14) SCR 53; Jagbir Singh v. Haryana State c Agriculture Marketing Board and Anr. (2009)15 SCC 327:2009 (10) SCR 908; Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Board v. Laxmi Kant Gupta (2009) 16 SCC 562: 2008 (13) SCR 1051; Senior Superintendent Telegraph (Traffic), Bhopal v. Santosh Kumar Seal and Ors. (2010) 6 SCC 773; D Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. Man Singh (2012) 1 SCC 558 - relied on.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The appeal is partly allowed to the above extent with
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — s. 11A; Constitution of India — arts. 14, 16.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.