✦ Supreme Court of India

LAXMIBAI (DEAD) THR. LRS & Anr. v. BHAGWANTBUVA (DEAD) THR. LRS & Ors.

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Indian Evidence Act, 1872 ss. 57(1), 134, 138, 146
Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 s. 16
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. XVIII r. 16

Judgment

Dr. Surajmani Stella Kujur v. Durga Charan Hansdah 2001 (1) SCR 1028 =AIR 2001 SC 938; Sa/ekh Chand (Dead) thr. Lrs. v. Satya Gupta & Ors. 2008 (3) SCR 833 = (2008) 13 SCC 119; Bhimashya & Ors. v. Smt. Janabi @ Janawwa, 2006 (10) Suppl. SCR 628 = (2006) 13 SCC 627; Ram Kanya Bai & Anr. v. Jagdish & Ors. 2011 (7) SCR 817 = AIR 2011 SC 3258; Effuah Amissah v. Effuah Krabah, AIR 1936 P.C. 147; T. Saraswati Ammal v. Jagadambal & Anr. H 1953 SCR 939 = AIR 1953 SC 201; Ujagar Singh v. Mst. Jeo, LAXMIBAI (DEAD) THR. LRS. v. BHAGWANTBUVA 635 (DEAD) THR. LRS.

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Supreme Court of India or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Appeal No. 2058 of 2003). ← Search more judgments

Judgment

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

Related cases why they’re linked — not procedural history

More cases under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Continue researching