✦ Supreme Court of India

PUTTAMMA & Ors. v. K. L. NARAYANA REDDY & Anr.

Case Details Supreme Court of India

UP. State Road Transport Corporation & Ors. v. Trilok Chandra & Ors. (1996) 4 SCC 362: 1996 (2) Suppl. SCR 443; Oriental Insurance· Co. Ltd. v. Hansrajbhai V. Koda/a (2001) 5 SCC 175: 2001 (2) SCR 999; Deepal Girishbhai Son and others vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Baroda (2004) 5 SCC 385 and Sar/a Verma (Smt.) and others vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and another 2009(6) SCC 121: 2009 (5) SCR 1098 - referred to.

8. Grant of Interest: Section 171 of the Act, 1988 deals G with the award of interest where any claim is allowed. Under the said provision no rate of interest has been fixed.and its duty is bestowed· upon the Tribunal to fix the rate of interest. This question is kept open· for Tribunals and Courts to decide the rate of interest after taking into H consideration the rate of interest allowed by the Supreme PUTTAMMA & ORS. v. K. L. NARAYANA REDDY & 841 ANR. Court in similar case and other factors such as inflation, A change.in economy, policy adopted by the Reserve Bank .of India from time to time and the period since when the case is pending. [Paras 57, 62] (890-F, H; 892-E-F] · Kaushnuma Begum v. New India( Assurance Co. Ltd. & B

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments