STATE OF M.P v. BABULAL & Ors.

2. In the present case, four persons were injured and two of them had more than one head injury. There were too many injuries on their persons and some of them had E been inflicted on vital parts of the body. High Court could not be justified in taking a lenient view which reduces the administration of the criminal justice system to a mockery. Therefore, the Judgment of the High Court is set aside and that of the Trial Court is restored. [Paras 17 and 20] [31-E-G; 32-E] F Mahesh and etc. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh AIR 1987 SC 1346: 1987 (2) SCR 710; State of Punjab vs. Bira Singh and Ors. (1995) Supp. 3 SCC 708; Chinnadurai vs. State of Tamil Nadu AIR 1996 SC 546: 1995 (3) Suppl. SCC 686; G State of U.P. vs. Shri Kishan AIR 2005 SC 1250; Sadhupati Nageswara Rao vs. State of Andhra Pradesh AIR 2012 SC 3242: 2012 (6) SCR 1143; Alister Anthony Pareira vs. State of Maharashtra AIR 2012 SC 3802: 2012 (1) SCR 145; State of Karnataka vs. Krishnappa AIR 2000 SC 1470: 2000 (2) H SCR 761; Dalbir Singh vs. State of Haryana AIR 2000 SC STATE OF M.P. v. BABULAL & ORS. 23