MIS. DSR STEEL (P) LTD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Electricity Act, 2003 ss. 62, 64, 94(1)(f), 125
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 100
Case journey
Linked proceedings
Civil Appeal No. 3814 of 2007
This judgmentCivil Appeal No. 870 of 1966
Built from judgments in the Courts & Cases corpus and the links detected in their text. Coverage is incomplete — earlier or later proceedings may be missing, so verify against the official record. How Case Journey works
Judgment
HELD: 1.1 The appeals are liable to be dismissed as no substantial question of law arises for consideration. An appeal u/s. 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 is maintainable before the Supreme Court only on the grounds specified in Section 100 CPC. Section 100 D c:P.C. in turn permits filing of an appeal only if the case involves a substantial question of law. Findings of fact re.corded by the courts below, which would in the present case, imply the Regulatory Commission as the court of first instance and the Appellate Tribunal as the court E hearing the first appeal, cannot be re-opened before Supreme Court in an appeal u/s. 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Just as the High Court cannot interfere with the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the courts below in a second appeal u/s. 100 CPC so also Supreme Court F would be loathed to entertain any challenge to the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the Regulatory Commission and the Appellate Tribunal. [Para 7] [592-D G]
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Another 1 relationship is under human verification and not counted above.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
Later judgments that treat this case
- Relied on2023_12_697_713