SAHARA INDIA REAL ESTATE CORP. LTD & Ors. v. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 3, 4
- Constitution of India arts. 19(2), 129, 215
- Human Rights Act, 1998
- Punjab Special Powers (Press) Act, 1956
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Case journey
Linked proceedings
Criminal Appeal No. 1255 of 1999
Built from judgments in the Courts & Cases corpus and the links detected in their text. Coverage is incomplete — earlier or later proceedings may be missing, so verify against the official record. How Case Journey works
Judgment
State of Maharashtra v. Rajendra J. Gandhi (1997) 8 SCC 386: 1997 (4) Suppl. SCR 68; Chintaman Rao v. The State of Madhya Pradesh (1950) SCR 759; Maneka Gandhi D v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Brij Bhushan v. State of Delhi AIR (1950) SC 129; Virendra v. State of Punjab AIR (1957) SC 896: 1958 SCR 308; K.A. Abbas v. Union of India AIR (1971) SC 481: 1971 (2) SCR 446; Binod Rao v. Minocher Rustom Masani 78 Born LR E 125; C. Vaidya v. D' Penha decided by Gujarat High Court in Sp. CA 141 of 1976; Reliance Petrochemicals Ltd. v. Proprietors of Indian Express Newspapers Bombay (P) Ltd. AIR 1989 SC 190: 1988 (3) Suppl. SCR 212; Naresh Shridhar Mirajk11r v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1967 SC 1: F 1966 SCR 744; Kehar Singh v. State (Delhi Administration) AIR 1988 SC 1883: 1988 (2) Suppl. SCR 24; Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court 457 US 596; Mohd. Shahabuddin v. State of Bihar (2010) 4 SCC 653: 2010 (3 ) SCR 911; Delhi Judicial Service Association v. State of G Gujarat (1991) 4 SCC 406: 1991 (3) SCR 936; Supreme Court Bar Association v. Union of India (1S98) 4 SCC 409: 1998 (2) SCR 795; A.K. Gopalan v. Noordeen (1969) 2 SCC 734; Ram Autar Shukla v. Arvind Shukla 1995 Supp (2) SCC 130: 1994 (5) Suppl. SCR 707; Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing H 262 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2012] 12 S.C.R.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.