V. CHANDRASEKARAN & Anr. v. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
The appeals are dismissed with the costs of
Provisions considered
Judgment
Pandit Leela Ram v. Union of India AIR 1975 SC E 2112: 1976 (1) SCR 341; Sneh Prabha v. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1996 SC 540: 1995 (5) Suppl. SCR 264; Union of india v. Shri Shiv Kumar Bhargava and Ors. JT (1995) 6 SC 274: 1995 (1) SCR 354; U.P. Jal Nigam v. Mis. Katra Properties Pvt. Ltd. AIR 1996 SC 1170: 1996 (1) F SCR 683 ; Ajay Kishan Singha/ v. Union of India AIR 1996 SC 2677: 1996 (4) Suppl. SCR 319; Mahavir and Anr. v. Rural Institute, Amravati and Anr. (1995) 5 SCC 335: 1995 (2) Suppl. SCR 421 ; Gian Chand v. Gopala and Ors. (1995) 2 SCC 528: 1995 (1) SCR 412; Meera Sahni v. Lieutenant Governor of Delhi and Ors. (2008) 9 SCC 177: 2008 (10) G SCR 1012 - relied on.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The appeals are dismissed with the costs of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Land Acquisition Act; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — s. 4(1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — s. 41; State Amendment Act, 1996; Constitution of India; Tamil Nadu Act.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.