G. REDDEIAH v. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH & Anr.

order nor the sponsoring authority placed any material A regarding the same, hence, the ultimate detention order passed 12. 11.2010 cannot be sustained. If the Detaining Authority was aware of the relevant fact, namely, that he was under custody from 09.10.2010 and he would be released or likely to be released or as in this case B released on 10. 11.2010 and if an order is passed after due satisfaction in that regard, undoubtedly, the order would be valid. The said objection was neither raised before the Advisory Board nor in the representation to the Government and was not mentioned in the grounds of c challenge and argued before the High Court. This ground was not even raised in the special leave petition. It was not in dispute that such objection was not raised anywhere except during the course of argument. It was also not in dispute that the detenue was given adequate 0 opportunity of hearing before the Advisory Board and all his grievances were addressed to by the Board and submitted its report. The Government, on going through the entire materials including the report of the Advisory Board as well as the representation of the detenue, considering the gravity of the offence alleged against him E and his habituality, confirmed the order of detention. [Para 9, 11, 12] [468-D-F; 469-H; 470-A-D; 470-F-G]