NATIONAL HYDROELECTRIC POWER CORPN. LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

8. According to the Authority for Advance Rulings (MR), the assessee supplied electricity at the tariff rate notified by CERC and recovered the sale price; which became its income; that, in future the said sale price was neither refundable nor adjustable against the future bills; that, the sale price (which includes MD) was shown as "sales" in the profit and loss account; that, it was received in terms of the invoice raised by the assessee and, therefore, it was "income" in the year of C receipt. However, according to AAR, when it came to computation of book profit, assessee deducted the MD component from total sale price and only the balance amount net of MD was taken into profit and loss account and book profit. Consequently, MR ruled (which is challenged herein) that reduction of MD from the "sales" was nothing but a D reserve which has to be added back on the basis of clause (b) of Explanatfon~ r to Section 11 SJB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("1961 Act", for short).

9. We quote hereinbelow Explanation-I to Section 115JB E of the 1961 Act which reads as under: "Explanation 1 - For the purposes of this section, "book profit" means the net profit as shown in the profit and loss account for the relevant previous year prepared under sub- F section (2), as increased by - (a) (b) the amounts carried to any reserves, by whatever name called, other than a reserve specified under G section 33AC; or if any amount referred to in clauses (a) to (h) is debited to the profit and loss account, and as reduced by ... " H 20 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 1 S.C.R. A B

10. We find merit in this civil appeal. On reading Explanation-I, quoted above, it is clear that to make an addition under clause (b) two conditions must be jointly satisfied: (a) There must be a debit of the amount to the profit and loss account. (b} The amount so debited must be carried to the reserve.

11. Since the amount of AAD is reduced from sales, there is no debit in the profit and loss account. The amount did not C enter the stream of income for the purposes of determination of net profit at all, hence clause (b} of Explanation-I was not applicable. Further, "reserve" as contemplated by clause (b) of the Explanation-I to Section 115JB of the 1961 Act is required to be carried through the profit and loss account. At this stage D it may be stated that there are broadly two types of reserves, viz, those that are routed through profit and loss account and those which are not carried via profit and loss account, for example, a Capital Reserve such as Share Premium Account. AAD is not a reserve. It is not appropriation of profits. AAD is E not meant for an uncertain purpose. AAD is an amount that is under obligation, right from the inception, to get adjusted in the future, hence, cannot be designated as a reserve. AAD is nothing but an adjustment by reducing the normal depreciation includible in the future years in such a manner that at the end F of useful life of the Plant (which is normally 30 years) the same would be reduced to nil. Therefore, the assessee cannot use the AAD for any other purpose (which is possible in the case of a reserve) except to adjust the same against future depreciation so as to reduce the tariff in the future years. As G stated, above, at the end of the life of the Plant AAD will be reduced to nil. In fact, Schedule XII-A to the balance sheet for the financial years 2004-05 onwards indicates recouping. In our view, AAD is "income received in advance". It is a timing difference. It represents adjustment in future which is in-built in H the mechanism notified on 26.5.1997. This adjustment may NATIONAL HYDROELECTRIC POWER CORPN. LTD. 21 v. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX [S.H. KAPADIA, J.] take place over a long period of time. Hence, we are of the view A that AAD is not a reserve.

12. For the aforestated reasons, we hold that AAD is a timing difference, it is not a reserve, it is not carried through profit and loss account and that it is "income received in advance" subject to adjustment in future and, therefore, clause (b) of Explanation-I to Section 11 SJB is not applicable. Accordingly, the impugned ruling is set aside and the civil appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed with no order as to costs. D.G. Appeal allowed. 8 c