STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH v. NISHANT SAREEN
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
1.4 The investigating agency might have had legitimate grievance about the order refusing to grant F sanction, and if that were so and no fresh materials were necessary, it ought to have challenged the order of the sanctioning authority but that was not done. The power of the sanctioning authority being not of continuing character could have been exercised only once on the G same materials. [Para 14] [1211-E-F]
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Supreme Court of India or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Appeal No. 2353 of 2010).
← Search more judgments