PARAMJEET SINGH@ PAMMA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 302, 307
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 161, 313
- Indian Evidence Act, 1872 s. 27
Judgment
#5. Abscondance by a person against whom FIR has lodged, having an apprehension of being apprehended by the police, cannot be said to be unnatural. Absconding by itself is not conclusive proof of either of guilt or of a guilty conscience. [Para 34) [1087- E F, G]
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Supreme Court of India or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Appeal No. 1699 of 2007).
← Search more judgments