RAJENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA & Ors. v. SAMYUTKSHETRIYA GRAMIN·BANK &'()RS
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
RAJENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA v. SAMYUT KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANK 937 at 78% is exqessive, unreasonable or arbitrqry. A
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Provincial Rural Banks Act, 1976 — s. 29; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Supreme Court of India, on 20 Dec 1996. The bench was R V RAVEENDRAN, P SATHASIVAM.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Another 2 relationships are under human verification and not counted above.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
Later judgments that treat this case
- Followedgahc030005532024_1_2025-08-14
- Followedgahc030005952024_1_2025-08-14
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Supreme Court of India or eCourts case status.
← Search more judgments