✦ Supreme Court of India

Civil Appeal No. 813-814 of 2004 · Supreme Court of India

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

1.3 Penalty under Section 114A is imposable only when the demand is confirmed under the proviso to section 28(1) of the Act. In view of the clear findings of the. Commissioner that the respondent-assessees are not guilty of suppression of facts or collusion or misstatement, E duty cannot be imposed by invoking the extended period of limitation. When the duty itself cannot be imposed, no order of imposing the penalty under section 114A of the Act can be sustained. [para 42] [684-C-D] P & B Pharmaceuticals (P) Ltd. v. Collector of Central F

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Supreme Court of India or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Appeal No. 813-814 of 2004). ← Search more judgments