Civil Appeal No. 1313 of 2008 · Supreme Court of India
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
A eliminated fro.m the process of selection those who secured less than the minimum in the interview. The minimum marks for interview ·had never been adopted by the High Court earlier for selection of District & Sessions Judges, (Grade II). Therefore, introduction of the B requirement of minimum marks for interview, after the entire selection process (consisting of written examination and interview) was completed, would amount to changing the rules of the game after the game was played which is clearly impermissible. [paras 21, 22, 24] [1046-E, F, G; 1047-A, E, F, G; 1048-B, C, D, E]
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.