✦ Supreme Court of India

ARUMUGAM v. STATE

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

The appeal is allowed to the aforesaid extent

Provisions considered

Judgment

#3. When the factual background is considered in the touchstone of the legal position set out, the inevitable F conclusion is that the appropriate conviction would be under Section 304 (Part. I) IPC instead of Section 302 IPC. Custodiar sentence of 1 O years would meet the ends of justice. [Para 17] [319-D]

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The appeal is allowed to the aforesaid extent

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 300, 302, 323; Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Supreme Court of India or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Appeal No. 967 of 2001). ← Search more judgments