✦ Supreme Court of India

SWARAN SINGH & Ors. v. STATE THROUGH STANDING COUNSEL & Anr.

Case at a glance

Judgment

2.1 At this stage all that the High Court can see in the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or in a writ petition, is whether on a perusal of the FIR, treating the allegations to be correct, a criminal offence is prima facie made out or not or whether there is any statutory bar. A perusal of the FIR clearly shows that, prima facie, an offence is made out c against the appellants 2 and 3. Treating the allegations in the FIR to be correct an offence under Section 3(1 )(x) of the Act is prima facie made out against appellants 2 and 3 because it prima facie seems that the intent of the appel- lants was to insult or humiliate the first informant, and this D was done within the public view. The trial has still to be held and the appellants will have an opportunity of estab- lishing their innocence in the trial. However, at this stage the FIR against them cannot be quashed and the trial must proceed. [Paras 8, 25 and 26] [137,H; 138,A; 142,D-E-F] . . E

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Supreme Court of India or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Appeal No. 1287 of 2008). ← Search more judgments