", RAM BACHAN RAJ & Ors. v. RAM UDAR RA! JANUARY 18 & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the correct position of law is expressed in Shankar Ba/ant lokhande (Dead) by lRs. v. Chandrakunt S. Lokhande & Anr, [1995] 3 SCC 413 and in other two cases the correct principles in law were not kept in view. We find that there is some area of conflict amongst several two-judge Bench decisions. It is also to be noticed that noticing the conflict between these judgments, reference has G been made to a three-Judge Bench in Chiranji Lal (dead) by lrs. v. Hari Das (dead) by Lrs .. f2005] 2 SCC 261. This case may also be placed before Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India for appropriate orders to be placed alongwith Chiranji Lal 's case (supra). H R.P. Appeal referred to three Judge bench.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.