COMMISSIONER OF Cl v. MIS. CEA T LTD., NASIK
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Ltd, the appeal is dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Central Excise Act, 1944; Section 35L/Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; C Tariff Headings 59.02 and 59.06, Chapter Note-4 to Chapter 59 and Note-4 to Section XI of the Act: Classification-Dipped Tyre Fabric/Rubberised Tyre Cord Fabric-levy of excise duty under Tariff Headings 59.02 or 59.06- Held: Jn view of reasons recorded in the connected case viz. Commissioner of Central Excise v. MR.F. Ltd, the appeal is dismissed D E F CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 6971of1999. From the Judgment and Order dated 5.4.99 of the Central Excise, Customs and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, West Reginal Bench at Mumbai in A. No. E/167-R/99-Bom in F.O. No. C-11504-505/WZB of 1999. R. Mohan, Additional Solicitor General, Rajiv Dutta, Hemant Shanna, P. Panneswaran and B.Krishna Prasad for the Appeltant. Ravinder Narain, Sonu Bhatnagar, Ajay Aggarwal and Rajan Narain for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KAPADIA, J. For the reasons given in our decision in Commissioner of Central Excise v. M.R.F. ltd., reported in (2005) I Scale 554, this Civil Appeal filed by the department relating to classification of Rubberised Tyre Cord Fabric is dismissed,. with no order as to costs. G S.K.S. Appeal dismissed. 164
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.