✦ Supreme Court of India

STATE OF ORISSA v. SHRI B.K. ROUTRA Y

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

In the premises, the present appeal is allowed and the award of A

Judgment

In this connection, our attention has been drawn to the decision of this Court in State of Orissa v. B.N. Agarwal/a, reported in [1997) 2 SCC 469. In paragraph 18, this Court has held that interest cannot be given for the period prior to the coming into force of the Interest Act, 1978. This Court has also held that the decision in the case of Executive Engineer (Inigation) v. Abhaduta Jena, reported in [1988) 1 SCC 418 has not been C over-ruled in so far as it deals with interest for the pre-reference period. This Court has upheld the view taken inAbhaduta Jena's case to the effect that in respect of pre-reference period, interest cannot be awarded in respect of the period not covered by the Interest Act, 1978. Our attention was also drawn to a decision in the case of State of Orissa v. Niranjan Swain, reported in [1989] 4 SCC 269 where also this Court said that where reference to arbitration was made prior to the commencement of the Interest Act, 1978, Arbitrator is not empowered to grant interest for the period upto the date of submission of claim to arbitration. D In this connection, we would also like to refer to Section 6(2) of the E Interest Act, 1978 which provides as follows : F Section 6(1) ··························· Section 6(2) : The provisions of this Act shall not apply to any suit or other legal proceeding pending at the commencement of this Act and the provisions of the corresponding law applicable imme diately before such commencement shall, notwithstanding the repeal of such law by sub-section (1), continue to apply to such suit or other legal proceedings." This section also clearly provides that the provisions of the Interest G Act, 1978 shall not apply to any legal proceeding pending at the commen cement of the said Act. Since the definition of "Court" under Section 2( a) includes a Tribunal or Arbitrator, the proceedings before the Arbitrator would also be covered by the expression "legal proceedings" in Section 6(2). Therefore interest Act, 1978 does not apply to pending arbitration H proceedings. STATEv. G.SHRIB.I.ROUTARY 73 In the premises, the present appeal is allowed and the award of A interest for the pre-reference period, namely, 31.3.1977 to 20.3.1980 is disallowed. The award and the decree are modified accordingly to this effect. T.N.A. Appeal allowed. B

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In the premises, the present appeal is allowed and the award of A

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Act-Provisions of Act; Interest Act, 1978; Interest G Act, 1978.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Supreme Court of India or eCourts case status (search case no. M.A No. 193 of 1984). ← Search more judgments