BADRI PRASAD v. DY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION & Ors.

KRISHNA IYER, J.-For around 50 years, a man and a woman, as the facts in this case unfold, lived as husband and wife. An adventurist challenge to the factum of marriage between the two, by the petitioner in thi~ special leave petition, has been negatived by the High Court. A strong presumption arises in favour of wed-lock where the partners have lived together for a long spell as husband and wife. Althongh the presumption is rebuttable, a heavy burden lies on him who seeks to deprive the relationship of legal origin. Law leans in favour of legiti In this view, the contention of Shri macy and frowns upon bastardy. Garg, for the petitioner, that long after the alleged marriage, evidence has not been produced to sustain its ceremonial process by examining If man and the priest or other witnesses, deserves no consideration. woman who live as husband and wife in society are compelled to prove, half a century later, by eye-witness evidence that they were validly married, few wi.ll succeed. The contention deserves to be negatived and we do so without hesitation. The special leave petitions are dismissed. S.R. Petitions dismissed. •