Uttarakhand HC — 2006 Judgments
1,097 judgments · Page 7 of 11
Research topics · Statutes & sections · Recent case-law digest
- WRIT PETITION NO. 994 (MS) OF 2006 v. M/s Mahindra Industries, Bye Pass Road, Kichha
- (Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting.) v. State & Ors.
- Dr. Pitamber Datt Pandey v. State of Uttaranchal
- Chapter VIII, Rule 32(2) (b) v. Sri Vijaypal Singh
- Mahesh Chandra Sharma v. Cane Commissioner cum Registrar, Cooperative Sugar
- (Court(cid:146)s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting) v. Session Judge, Nainital & 5 others
- (Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting) v. State of Uttaranchal & Anr.
- (Chapter VIII Rule 32(2) (b) v. United India Insurance Company Ltd
- Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting v. Dharam Singh
- Writ Petition No. 1037 of 2002 · Uttarakhand High Court
- District Nainital v. Uttaranchal
- Gopal Singh v. State of U.P
- Chapter VIII, Rule 32(2) (b) v. A.F.R. (Approved for Reporting)
- (Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting.) v. Vice Chancellor G.B. University & Ors.
- (Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting.) v. Commissioner Kumaun
- Deputy Director Agriculture v. Mr. Harendra Belwal, Brief Holder for the State
- Prakash Chandra v. The inspector General of Police
- Nainital v. State
- Nanua Ram v. State
- State through Executive Officer v. Shri Dan Singh Bisht
- Liakat & Ors. v. State
- (Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting.) v. State of U.P
- Chapter VIII, Rule 32(2) (b) v. A.F.R. (Approved for Reporting)
- Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting v. State of U.P. through Secretary, Public Works Department, U.P. Lucknow
- Hakim Singh v. State of U.P
- Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting v. Damodar Prasad Kala
- Nainital v. Sri G.S. Sandhu, learned A.G.A. for the State
- Criminal Appeal No. 347 of 2001 · Uttarakhand High Court
- WRIT PETITION NO. 1197 (M/S) OF 2004 v. Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, District
- (Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting.) v. State of Uttaranchal & Ors.
- WRIT PETITION NO. 1077 (M/S) OF 2004 v. Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, District
- Nandan Lal Shah v. Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad & Ors.
- Nandan Lal Shah v. Executive Officer, Nagar
- M/s Prem Sukh Construction Company v. The Chairman & Managing Director
- (Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) v. Rent Control and Eviction Officer, Dehradun
- WRIT PETITION NO. 1323 (M/S) OF 2004 v. Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, District
- WRIT PETITION NO. 1327 (M/S) OF 2004 v. Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, District
- Revisionists v. Arya Samaj Kotdwara
- Jagat Singh v. Shamshad Ali & Ors.
- Uttaranchal High Court · 2006
- Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting v. Sri Haria- (deceased)
- Souninder Singh Hooda v. State of Uttaranchal, through Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj, Uttaranchal Govt., Dehradun
- Writ Petition No. 1602 (M/B) of 2001 v. Divisional Leave Committee
- Criminal Appeal No. 1711 of 2001 · Uttarakhand High Court
- Sri Govind Ram Puri & Ors. v. Board of Revenue A.F.R & Ors.
- Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting v. Bachan Singh Negi
- Gainu v. State
- The High Court · 2006
- Writ Petition No. 146 (S/B) of 2006 v. State of Uttaranchal through Principal Secretary
- Uttaranchal High Court · 2006
- Chhajju Ram v. Board of Revenue U.P. at Allahabad
- ) Satnam Singh v. The State
- Kharak Singh v. State & Ors.
- Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting v. New Delhi
- Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting v. Van Panchyat, mall Vishua
- Chapter VIII, Rule 32(2) (b) v. State of Uttaranchal, through Secretary, Ministry of Transport Appellate Tribunal, Uttaranchal
- Subhash Chandra Pant v. Director, School Education & Ors.
- Chapter VIII, Rule 32(2) (b) v. A.F.R. (Approved for Reporting)
- ) Puran Singh v. R.K. Shah
- The State v. ALONG
- Court’s Order whether the case is or not approved for reporting v. Kamal Singh
- Nirmal Kumar Singh v. State of Uttaranchal & Ors.
- Km. Oshika Thapliyal, through her natural guardian and next friend v. Ashok Thapliyal
- Chapter VIII, Rule 32(2) (b) v. State
- Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting v. Prabhagiya Van Adhikari
- The Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut v. Shri Ashok Prapann Sharma, Anand Bhawan, Rishikesh, District Dehradun
- Commissioner, Sales Tax, U.P. Lucknow …Revisionist S/S I.D.P.L. Welfare Canteen, Veerbhadra, Rishikesh v. Sri Pitamber Maulkhi, learned Additional
- Tehri Hydro Development Corporation Limited, Tehri v. Tehri Hydro Development Corporation Limited
- Himmat Singh Rawat v. Bhuwan Chandra Pandey
- (Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting) v. State of Uttaranchal and five ors
- Managing Director Subhas Dora v. District Dehradun
- State of Uttaranchal through Secretary, Public Works v. Dev Singh
- Balwant Singh & Ors. v. The State
- Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting v. Sri Fateh Singh Panwar
- Chapter VIII, Rule 32(2) (b) v. A.F.R. (Approved for Reporting)
- Nainital v. State of Uttaranchal
- Smt. Deepa Devi & Anr. v. Pariyojna Nideshak Brief facts for the disposal of this appeal are that & Anr.
- Uttarnchal High Court · 2006
- Chapter VIII, Rule 32(2) (b) v. State
- The State v. Criminal Appeal No. 313-A of 2001
- Nainital v. State of Uttaranchal through Principal
- Nainital v. Sri Amit Bhatt, learned A.G.A
- Sanjay Goel v. State of Uttaranchal
- Uttaranchal High Court · 2006
- Nainital v. Sri Amit Bhatt, learned A.G.A
- Nainital v. Sri Amit Bhatt, learned A.G.A
- Chapter VIII, Rule 32(2) (b) v. State
- (Court(cid:146)s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting) v. State of Uttaranchal
- Nainital v. State of Uttaranchal through Principal
- Nainital v. State of Uttaranchal through Principal
- Nainital v. State of Uttaranchal through Principal
- U.P. Lucknow v. Rudrapur, Haldwani
- Sri Mangat Rai Singhal v. Smt. Saeeda Khatun
- Uttaranchal High Court · 2006
- The Commissioner v. S/s Prakash Tubes Ltd
- (Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting) v. Addl. District Judge/FTC Ist, Approved for reporting
- WRIT PETITION NO.844 (MS) OF 2006 v. Jagdish Chandra
- Acquittal) No. 1172 of 2001 (Old No. 3024 of 1982) The State v. Om Prakash Sundariyal (Since deceased) Constable, Police Out Post Surai Thota, Police
- Smt. Lata Rani v. State of Uttaranchal
- Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting v. Ram Singh