A will signed under pressure. A cheque returned once, then twice. An eviction notice with the wrong address. Cases turn on facts — so the search should too. Describe the matter as it happened, and Courts & Cases returns the judgments whose reasoning actually fits yours.
\"Does this document contain my words?\" A full-text engine returns everything that happens to share a term, regardless of whether the case is on all fours with yours. You then read dozens of near-misses.
\"Is this dispute the same kind as mine?\" The system weighs relationship, event, conduct, injury and timing — and returns precedents ranked by how close the facts align, with the operative paragraphs quoted.
No paywalled citations. Open the entire judgment, including the headnote and the operative paragraphs.
Quoted holdings are reproduced from the judgment text with their paragraph references — not paraphrased.
Supreme Court, the High Court, the bench and the decision date are shown up front, so hierarchy and recency are judged before reading.
The snippet shows why the judgment fits your facts — so you know whether to read the full text before you do.
Fact-pattern search retrieves candidate judgments from the indexed corpus, ranks them by factual alignment, and only then does the model summarise and quote. The answer is built from what was found, not from memory — so nothing phantom can be cited, and nothing quoted can be invented.
Fact-pattern research narrows the haystack. Reading the right judgment, applying the rule, and deciding what binds remains the advocate's work. Every claim in this tool's output is one click from the source it rests on.
Type the facts as the client told you. See which precedents fit, and which don't.